Storage Know How and the “Way” of the Universe
Great truths are simple and self evident. Often they are seen but not realised. In this category is our capacity to understand storage. The social significance of this is massive. It was the seed of humanities distinctness and the basis of our human civilisation. It was the basis for modern society. It provides the means for our post modern reintegration into the “Way” of a universe we never left.
Until 10000 years ago we were hunter gatherers. Closely integrated with our environment. We lived on the same time frame as what we used to exist. We ate what we found. Our planet's plenty was available free dependent on our place of being and the seasons. We ate meat, fruit and vegetables. Our bodies do not store these as fat . They cannot be stored externally. They putrefy and go bad. A small amount of our food was storable, carbohydrates, grains, sugar etc. These do not putrefy. Our bodies can convert them to fat . They can be stored.
Such foods are not naturally produced in usable form in quantity suitable to sustain human survival. They have to be cultivated. Left to nature they exist in sufficient quantity to store only a small amount as body fat. This can sustain us when other food is scarce. As hunter gatherers if lucky we might find sufficient to store a little directly. The Garden of Eden provided us with a sufficiency that included a means of storing usable sustenance when other sources were sparse.
In this world property was without meaning. Everything was free from nature. In the Garden of Eden nothing self evidently existed in a particular form except fleetingly. Each form was a short term by-product of the process of being. All that found sufficient to exist did so for an allotted time and passed away. On human time scales the universe, nature and humanity may appeared to have then been in perfect balance. This is an unhelpfully false perception.
It ignores nature, the “Way”, of the Universe, a process not a form. Human insight comes from gaining perspectives enabling one to see its flows apart from the forms it momentarily creates.
On the “Way” a moment must be seen in cosmic proportions. On these our planet' existence is a fleeting event. The form we call life on it is of even less significance and within that a distinct human life form is barely noticeable and within humanity's ambience modern civilization is a trivially short experience hardly worthy of comment
This is written by a Britain from Reading, a city 40 miles West of London who now lives in Suzhou a Chinese city, 40 miles West of Shanghai. London could just claim a visible history of 2000 years Reading perhaps 1000. In holistic human terms these two cities have only been of any great socio-economic significance for 500 and 200 years respectively. Suzhou is frequently referred to by Confucius 2500 years ago as the capital of the Kingdom of Wu. It remains socially and economically significant to this day.
Americans are overwhelmed by European historical perspective. They will be shocked when China bursts into global perception during the 2008 Olympiad. This event has origin in a European civilisation with roots as old as those of China's but unlike China's the civilisation they supported no longer exists physically except as ruins but its stored unseen ideas permeate our lives to this day.
Like Reading Suzhou is close to a great modern metropolis, Shanghai. This was a fishing village 200 years ago when the British created it. It is now a significant global city. From a Chinese perspective it is a very recent Western intrusion of short term significance to their way of being..
In planetary terms these historical perspectives distort reality. Global warming could drown three of these cities this century. In cosmic terms this is hardly worthy of comment. To see things from these three points of view, human, planetary and cosmic, matters. Understanding the significance to humanity of our capacity to learn how to store actively can be seen in its truth depth only when viewed simultaneously from all three. Our capacity to consciously store the surpluses created on the “Way” can then be perceived as highly relevant to our species perceived integration with it.
Humans noted that seeds carelessly scattered when gathering a natural crop gave a renewed resource a year on. From this we learned, to nurture such occurrences, cultivation. Cultivating, farming storable carbohydrates, freed us from a day to day perspective based on seasonal local availability. Crops grow on an annual, solar, cycle. Our perspective became, solar and celestial rather not merely lunar and seasonal.
Crops can be grown in quantity and stored. Long, now extinct civilisations, depended on this. Moses demonstrated its truths to the Egyptians. The Assyrian's accounting tablets and the Incas knot records testify to the social significance of such know how. Recording and accounting were required not just expression. Only one civilisation based on this form of being lasted intact to the present day, China.
This approach to being requires sustainable propriety in land. This demands new social institution to protect it and its produce. Wealth invested in farming, irrigation, seed grain, fertilizer, and storing its products grain silos etc. need protecting from nature and people
The wealth created and stored does violence to natural order. It exclude people and nature from its bounty. Plants other than those cultivated become weeds and creatures that wish to feed on them become pests and people who seek to acquire them outside the rules of the society that creates them become criminals and enemies to be suppressed or eliminated along with the weeds and pests.
A state with access to significant lethal force is required to protect such wealth's accumulation and subsequent storage. Access to it other than by those granted the privilege has to be prevented. Plants, animals and people standing in the way of that or seeking to challenge need to be ruthlessly neutered or eliminated for the system to be successful. Plants become weeds, animals vermin and people other than your own enemies all to be ruthlessly eliminated in the interest of survival.
Without storable property protective communal investment is unnecessary. No incentive exists to acquire an unknown foraging area from a hunter gatherer. Once acquired it is of little use unless you know how to exploit it. Without modern technology could any of us, other than Eskimos and Bushmen, live in the Arctic or the Kalahari Desert? The “know how” required to survive as a hunter gatherer is in the communal experience of the people who occupy a place. Unique local “know how”, accumulated, learned and stored communally is the intellectual property required to exploit a place. This is not immediately available to any aspiring usurper.
Internal policing of a hunter gather groups intellectual and other property was not necessary. While all those with strength within such groups could take things by force from others but those others could also easily exclude them from the nurture and security the group offered. In the hostile day to day environment they lived in without such support and protection death was certain. To be injured or ill and be on your own meant death. To this day when symbolic excluded from their group by having a bone pointed at them Australian aboriginal simply lie down and die. In such a social context exclusion from a group is to be feared as much as physical violence.
It is to be noted that such a system puts men and women on an equal footing of power. In such a context brutish violent behaviour to obtain an end, including procreation, was not a viable strategy. Those using it were easily excluded from support and succour and so consigned to death.
Societies based on cultivation are different. They are based on propriety and the power it provides. Those with it use exclusion as the means to their ends. They have to practice violence to sustain it. Propriety excludes some from access. Violent acquisition leaves a usurper in possession of immediately usable wealth. Knowledge (intellectual property) on farming is publicly available. The written or recorded language such societies acquire for accounting purposes ensures this knowledge is stored. Such knowledge is not exclusive to those with particular local knowledge. An agricultural usurper acquires a resource that can be exploited quickly and immediately usable stored sustenance.
In this new social system socially organised violence was necessary to protect what one had. For similar reasons violence is a viable means of obtaining sustenance and procreating new societies based upon your own. The basic social entities had changed from globally diverse locally cohesive communally run groups to societies, states, based on the use of violent ruthless exclusion as means to protect what they had from the understandable self righteous violence of others.
In such a world war is the natural tool societies use to penetrate others to procreate their way of being. By these means the Way develops new sustainable approach to wealth creation and accumulation. In such a world women move from being equal partners in power to being property.
To be sustainable such societies needed to be larger than other similar ones. They need to afford to overwhelm any potential usurpers by force of arms. To be large requires an exceedingly stable and effective system of administration sustained over time.
The West never discovered such a system. It was plagued by wars, rape and pillage China found the Confucian and Taoist “Way” of stably achieving the required result and so being effective in agricultural. This extolled family stability and obedience echoed in, and modelled in the impartial behaviour of state officials appointed on the basis of merit not influence. It worked. China became, and remained for centuries, the sole continuing success story of the agricultural system. Family stability and the administrative system described dissipated disruptive social behaviour and provided an unchallengeable foundation for wealth and power creation.
To escape from the constraints required to achieve the stability necessary to sustain a successful agriculturally based system mankind had to discover ways to store and use sustenance not dependent on agriculture's annual solar cycle. It did so.
Over the billions of years of our planet's existence natural forces, on the Way, had created a short term means to break out of this suppressive annual solar cycle. Our planet of itself, in response to the energy extracted from and sent to it, electromagnetically and gravitationally, from the solar system, had fossilized some putrefying biological material and created concentrated useful stores of many minerals. Gravitation and plate tectonics built mountains, deep oceans and river systems. These provided sources of continuously renewable energy from the wind and the gravitational descent of water. This initially powered the ships and mills required to kick start the modern industrial age..
However these are especially fickle sources of power. Fossil fuels, the steam and then the petrol/diesel, engine were necessary before humanity could break out of the constraints set by the annual solar cycle. The capitalist system required to achieve all of this is truly modern being born a mere 200 years ago in the UK. Its leadership moved to the USA in the 20th Century. There people from all over the planet transplanted themselves. From this melting pot emerged an accumulation of scientific and technological know how on planetary exploitation and storage unprecedented in human history. This produced sustenance sufficient to human welfare unconstrained by the bounds set by our planet and the solar systems capacity to make sustenance naturally available to us.
In the 200 years since we discovered how to exploit and temporarily store the accumulated energy of our planet we have learned ho to use up resources accumulated over the whole of its existence. To achieve this required us to acquire entirely new ways of thinking, learning, accumulating, storing and communicating knowledge and know how. So to give birth to the modern, machine, age we simultaneously sowed the seeds necessary for the birth of what we call the post modern era..
The modern, machine based, age is reliant on new ways of acquiring, storing and distributing knowledge. #however to make that knowledge usefully it has to be physically embodied in machines that exploit our planets stored resources. This is unsustainable. It has been at a rate out of proportion to our planet and our solar system capacity to replace it in currently accessible form.
To work this system requires, respectively, considerable knowledge accumulation then population growth. This is necessary to provide the understanding then the means to first identify then exploit planetary resources. In this modern era the UK, then Europe then the USA and later North East Asia have been able to grow at unprecedented rates despite a consequent series of destructive wars. These wars should be seen as distinct from those typical in the day of agriculturally based empires.
They were not about the exclusiveness required for the agricultural system to work but about inclusiveness. The volumes of knowledge and people required to achieve such modernity requires wealth created by capital invested in machines. This process is only economically viable with stable access to large supplies of food, diverse mineral resources and large numbers of consumers for the resulting goods all dispersed haphazardly across the planet in a manner unrelated to political boundaries defined for the convenience of agriculturally based states. The variety and volume of resources required were not available within the ambience of any existing agricultural state.
The initial solution to this conundrum was imperialism.. This quickly proved uneconomic as first described by Adam Smith in “the Wealth of Nations (1776). As a result we had what was called the Pax Brittanica in the 19th Century. And a Pax Americana in the 20th Century. Paradoxically these both led to many wars. These wars were not politically imperialistic. They were about free trade, keeping sea routes and access to trade with all states open to everyone. Any attempts at exclusivity was fiercely resisted by those interested in free competitive trade, the UK and the USA. Some states tried to copy the earlier abandoned imperialistic approach. These states, Germany and Japan, found themselves in conflict with the emerging consensus.
Other states such as China found themselves after 2000 years of unchallenged power rudely awakened from their approach to security. They were forced by those with technological superiority to accept, “free trade” In relation to the UK this meant China accepting the right of British companies first to buy and sell through the ports they established at Shanghai and Hong Kong and later being forced to allow British companies to sell opium to their citizens. This trade by today's standards is morally indefensibly and even by 19th Century standards difficult to justify.
To exploit the planets stored resources effectively considerable violence needed to be deployed those who practised the indefensible policy of armed exclusion of humanity and nature from their territory. The new system sought to open up their borders not through violent insertion of foreign politically imperialistic rule but by soliciting acceptance of the advantages of mutually beneficial trade. In the end this system of trade has outwardly benefited all who have indulged in it.
By the mid 1990s the Japanese had succeeded beyond their wildest imperialistic dreams of penetrating and owning huge business in Korea, China, Taiwan, Hawaii, the US West Coast and Australia. They had previously tried to acquire such access unsuccessfully using force force. through trade and business they gained all they intended by force and more.
System derived from communal and personal security which drove individuals and societies to continuously seek out new ways of being. However all this activity was based on acquiring knowledge about how to exploit the resources created by our planet. These are essentially finite.
In the late twentieth century all this changed. We discovered the nature of the processes driving the universe at both the nuclear and cosmic levels. We now know how to use and exploit the former. As yet we only know about the latter in principal. We have not yet managed to a find a way to tap into its infinity sustenance. In seeking both these in local national and international interests we have began to reach beyond our planet. To do so we needed to invent new technologies for computation and communication. For the first time these gave us a means to store and distribute know how instantly in huge volumes and so the present knowledge based age was born.
Knowledge is infinite in its capacity to sustain. It's production has in essence to be communal. Knowledge can only be of value if shared. Exclusivity of the type prevalent in the agricultural and machine ages cannot sustain its creation. It is not reliant on the seasonal cycle of availability, hunter gathers relied on, nor the annual solar cycle the agriculturalist used nor the accumulated capacity of our planet capitalists utilised. It can and does tap into the unbounded sustenance provided by the Way of the Universe.
The signs are that the lead in this new age could come from China. China knows how to operate communally from a socio-politically point of view. However it has a people with a penchant for finding individualistic opportunities to do business and make money by exploiting new ideas and new opportunities. They can do so in a manner that underpins the common good rather than undermining as does such behaviour in the USA.
存贮知道怎么和"方式" 宇宙 巨大真相是简单和不言而喻的
存贮知道怎么和"方式" 宇宙巨大真相是简单和不言而喻的。经常他们被看见但没体会。在这个类别是我们的容量了解存贮。这的社会意义是巨型的。这是人文学科不同和我们人的文明的依 据种子。这是为现代社会的依据。它为我们的岗位现代重新结合提供手段入"方式" 宇宙我们从未左。 直到10000 年前我们是猎人收集者。严密集成以我们的环境。我们居住在和一样的时间表什么我们曾经存在。我们吃了什么我们发现了。我们的行星的丰足依靠可利用的自由是 和季节我们的地方。我们吃了肉、水果和蔬菜。我们的身体不存放这些作为油脂。他们无法外在地被存放。他们腐化和去坏。小量我们的食物是可仓储, 碳水化合物、五谷, 糖等。这些不腐化。我们的身体可能转换他们成油脂。他们可能被存放。 这样食物自然地不被生产以能用的形式在数量适当承受人的生存。他们必须耕种。左边对自然他们存在在充足的数量存放唯一少量当体脂肪。这可能承受我们当其它 食物是缺乏的。当猎人收集者如果幸运我们也许发现充足少许直接地存放。伊甸园提供我们以包括存放能用的生计手段的充分当其它来源是稀稀落落的。 在这个世界里物产是没有意思。一切是从自然解脱。在伊甸园里没什么自已显然地存在了以特殊形式除了暂短。各个形式是过程的一个短期副产物的是。所有发现充 足存在做因此被定量的时间和通过了。在人的时间表宇宙、自然和人类可以看来然后是在完善的平衡。这是无用假的悟性。 它忽略自然, "方式", 宇宙, 过程不是形式。人的洞察来自具有观点实现一个人看它的流程除形式之外它短暂地创造。 在"途中" 片刻必须看在宇宙比例。在这些我们的行星' 存在是一次暂短事件。我们叫生活对此的形式是不太意义并且在那之内一个分明人生形式是几乎没有引人注目的并且在人类的气氛之内现代文明是琐细地短的经验几 乎不值得评论 这由不列颠从读书, 城市写40 英哩在现在住在Suzhou 中国城市的伦敦西边, 40 英哩在上海西边。伦敦能要求2000 年的可看见的历史读或许1000 年。用全部人术语这两个城市只是任一了不起的社会经济的意义500 和200 年各自。Suzhou 由Confucius 频繁地指2500 年前吴王国的资本。它保留社会上和经济上重大对这天。 美国人由European 历史眼光淹没。他们将被冲击当中国破裂入全球性悟性在2008 年期间奥林匹克运动会。这次事件象那些有起源在欧洲文明以根一样老中国的但不同于中国的文明他们支持完全不再存在除了作为废墟但它的被存放的未看见的想法 渗入我们的生活对这天。 象读书Suzhou 是紧挨一个伟大的现代大都会, 上海。这是一个渔村200 年前当英国创造了它。这现在是一个重大全球性城市。从中国透视这是非常最近西部闯入短期意义对他们的方式是。 用星球术语这些历史眼光变形现实。全球性变暖能淹没三这些城市本世纪。用宇宙术语这是几乎不值得的评论。看事物从这些三个问题的看法, 人, 星球和宇宙, 事态。了解意义对我们的容量人类学会怎么活跃地存放能被看见它的真相深度只当同时观看从所有三。我们的容量神志清楚地存放节余被创造在"途中" 可能然后被察觉象高度相关与我们的种类被察觉的综合化以它。 人注意到, 种子粗心大意地驱散了当会集一片自然庄稼给了一种更新的资源每年。从这我们学会, 哺育这样发生, 耕种。耕种, 种田可仓储的碳水化合物, 解救了我们从每日透视根据季节性地方可及性。庄稼增长在每年, 太阳, 周期。我们的透视宁可成为了, 太阳和神圣不仅仅月球和季节性。 庄稼可能种植在数量和被存放。长期, 现在绝种文明, 依靠这。Moses 给埃及人展示了它的真相。亚述人的会计片剂和印加人纪录作证对这样的社会意义的结知道怎么。录音和会计是必需的不仅表示。只一文明根据这个现在持续的形式 原封, 中国。 对是的这种方法要求能承受的适当在土地。这要求新社会制度保护它和它的产物。财富被投资在种田, 灌溉、种子五谷, 肥料, 和存放它的产品谷粮仓等需要保护免受自然和人 财富被创造和被存放做暴力对自然命令。它从它的富饶排除人和自然。植物不同于那些耕种了成为的杂草并且希望喂养在他们的生物成为寻求获取他们在社会规则之 外创造他们的虫和人们成为罪犯和敌人被压制或被消灭与杂草和虫一起。 一个状态以对重大致死的力量的通入必需保护这样的财富的储积和随后存贮。对它的通入除由那些之外授予了特权必须防止。植物、动物和人们妨碍那或寻求质询需 要被阉割或冷酷地被消灭使系统是成功的。植物适合杂草、动物寄生虫和人们不同于您自己的敌人全部冷酷地被消灭在生存的兴趣。 没有可仓储的物产防护共同投资是多余的。刺激不存在获取一个未知的搜寻区域从猎人收集者。一旦获取它有微不足道的作用除非您会利用它。没有现代技术能任何 我们, 除爱斯基摩人和丛林居民之外, 居住在Arctic 或Kalahari 沙漠吗? "知道怎么" 要求生存如同猎人收集者在占领地方人民的共同经验。独特的本机"知道怎么", 积累, 学会和共同地存放是知识产权必需利用地方。这立刻不供给任何令人想往的篡位者。 内部维持治安猎人聚集小组智力和其它物产不是必要的。当所有那些以力量在这样小组心头能采取事由力量从其他人但那些其他人能从哺育容易地并且排除他们并且 小组提供的安全。在敌对每日环境里他们居住没有这样的支持并且保护死亡肯定。被伤害或不适和是在您自己意味的死亡。对这天当象征性从他们的小组被排除由有 骨头指向他们澳大利亚原史简单地躺下和死。在这样的社会环境排除从小组将恐惧尽量人身侵犯。 它将注意到, 这样系统把人和妇女放在力量上一个同等立足处。在这样上下文粗野的猛烈行为获得一个末端, 包括生育, 不是一个可实行的战略。那些使用它从支持和succour 容易地被排除了和因此被寄售了对死亡。 社会根据耕种是不同的。他们根据它提供的适当和力量。那些与它用途排除作为手段对他们的末端。他们必须实践暴力承受它。适当从通入排除一些。猛烈承购留下 篡位者拥有立刻能用的财富。知识(知识产权) 在种田公开地是可利用的。这样社会获取为会计目的书面或记录的语言保证这知识被存放。这样的知识不是专属的对那些以特殊地方知识。一个农业篡位者获取可能 被利用迅速和立刻能用的被存放的生计的一种资源。 在这个新社会系统社会上组织的暴力是必要保护什么你有。为相似的原因暴力是获得生计和生育新社会可实行的手段根据您自己。基本的社会个体作为手段当地变成 了从全球性地不同的言词一致的共同地奔跑小组社会, 状态, 根据对猛烈冷酷的排除的用途保护什么他们有从其他人的可理解的自已公正的暴力。 在这样世界大战中是自然工具社会用途击穿其他人生育他们的方式是。通过这些手段方式开发新能承受的方法对财富创建和储积。这样世界妇女从是搬走相等的伙伴 在力量向是物产。 是能承受的这样社会需要大的比其它相似部分。他们需要能淹没所有潜在的篡位者由胳膊力量。是大的要求管理被承受的随时间一个极为稳定和有效的系统。 西方从未发现了这样一个系统。它被战争困扰了, 强奸和拆抢中国找到Confucian 和Taoist "方式" 稳定地达到必需的结果和如此是有效的在农业。这被赞颂的家庭稳定和守纪echoed, 和塑造了在官方陈述公平的行为被任命根据优点不是影响。这有效。中国成为了, 和几个世纪保留了, 农业系统的单一继续的成功故事。家庭稳定和行政系统描述了被驱散的破裂社会行为和假设一个unchallengeable 基础为财富和力量创作。 从限制逃脱必需达到稳定必要承受成功的农业上基于的系统人类必须发现方式存放和使用生计不依赖于农业的每年太阳周期。它如此。 在亿万几年我们的行星的存在自然力量, 在途中, 创造了一短期手段发生这个抑压每年太阳周期。我们的行星本身, 以回应能量被提取从和寄发到它, 电磁式和重心, 从太阳系, 僵化了一些化脓的生物材料和创造了许多矿物被集中的有用的商店。万有引力和板块构造建立了山、深海和河系。这些提供了源泉的连续可再造能源从风和水重心下 降。这最初地供给船动力并且磨房要求对反撞力开始现代工业年龄。 但是这些是特别是善变的源泉的力量。矿物燃料、蒸汽和然后petrol/diesel, 引擎是必要的在人类能发生限制由每年太阳周期设置之前。资本家系统必需达到所有这真实地是现代的被负担一仅仅200 年前在英国。它的领导行动了向美国在20 世纪。人们从到处行星那里移植了自己。从这个熔炉涌现了储积科学并且技术知道怎么在星球开发和存贮史无前例在人类历史上。这个导致的生计充足对人的福利无 了拘束由区域由我们的行星和太阳系容量设置使生计自然地可利用对我们。 在200 年自从我们发现了怎么利用和临时地存放我们的行星积累能量我们学会ho 用尽资源被积累在整体它的存在。达到这要求我们获取整个地新思维方式, 学会, 积累, 存放和通信知识和知道怎么。如此诞生现代, 机器, 年龄我们同时播种了种子必要为什么的诞生我们称岗位现代时代。 现代, 机器根据, 年龄是倚赖于获取, 存放和分布知识新方式# 然而做, 知识它必须完全有用地被实现在利用我们的行星被存放的资源的机器里。这是不能坚持的。它是以率在比例外面对我们的行星和我们的太阳系容量替换它以当前容易 接近的形式。 工作这个系统要求, 各自, 可观的知识储积然后人口增长。这是必要提供理解手段对首先然后辨认然后盘剥星球资源。在这个现代时代英国, 然后欧洲然后美国和最新北部东亚能增长以史无前例的率尽管破坏性的战争结果系列。这些战争应该看与那些相区别典型在天农业上基于的帝国。 他们是没有关于排他性必需为农业系统工作而是关于包括。知识和人的容量被要求达到这样的现代性要求财富由资本创造被投资在机器里。这个过程是只经济上可实 行的以对食物、不同的矿物资源和很大数量的消费者大供应的稳定的通入为收效的物品随便所有被分散横跨行星有些无关对政治界限被定义为农业上基于的状态方便 起见。资源的品种和容量必需不是可利用的在任何现有的农业状态之内气氛。 最初的对这道难题的解决办法是帝国主义。这依照由亚当・史密斯首先描述迅速证明了不经济在"财富国家(1776) 。结果我们有什么称Pax Brittanica 在19 世纪。并且Pax 美国在20 世纪。这些两个似是而非地导致了许多战争。这些战争政治上不是帝国主义的。他们是关于自由贸易, 保留海路并且对贸易的通入以所有状态对大家打开。所有企图在排他性由那些剧烈地抵抗了感兴趣对自由竞争贸易、英国和美国。一些状态设法复制及早被摒弃的帝 国主义的方法。这些状态, 德国和日本, 被发现自己在冲突以涌现的公众舆论。 其它状态譬如中国发现了自己在2000 年未受挑战的力量以后粗鲁被唤醒从他们的方法对安全。他们由那些被迫以技术优势接受, "自由贸易" 在联系到英国这意味中国首先接受他们建立在上海和洪・Kong 和以后被迫允许英国的公司卖鸦片对他们的公民英国的公司的权利买和卖通过口岸。这贸易由今天标准道德上无法防御是和由19 世纪标准难辩解。 剥削行星有效地存放了资源可观的暴力必要部署那些实践人类和自然武装的排除无法防御的政策从他们的疆土。新系统寻求政治上开放他们的疆界不是通过外国帝国 主义的规则的猛烈插入但由请求相互有利贸易好处的采纳。在最后这个贸易系统向外有益于所有沉溺于它。 在中间90 年代以前日本人成功在击穿和拥有之外巨大的事务他们最狂放的帝国主义的梦想在韩国, 中国, 台湾, 夏威夷, 美国西海岸和澳洲。他们早先设法不成功地获取这样的通入使用力量力量通过贸易并且事务他们获取了所有他们意欲由力量和更。 系统从驾驶个体和社会连续寻找新方式是的共同和个人安全获得了。但是所有这活动根据获取知识关于怎样利用资源由我们的行星创造。这些根本上有限。 在20 世纪晚期所有这改变了。我们发现了过程的本质驾驶宇宙在核和宇宙水平。我们现在会使用和剥削前。我们只知道关于后者在校长。我们未处理对发现一个方式轻拍 入它的无限生计。在寻找两这些在我们有的地方全国和国际兴趣开始到达在我们的行星之外。做如此我们需要发明新技术为计算和通信。这些第一次给了我们手段存 放并且分布知道多么立即在巨大的容量和当前知识基于的年龄如此出生。 知识是无限的在它的容量承受。这是生产实质上有是共同的。知识可能只有价值如果分享。型的排他性流行在农业和机器年龄无法承受它的创作。它不是倚赖于可及 性的季节性周期, 猎人聚集依靠了, 亦不每年太阳周期农业学家被使用亦不我们的行星资本家积累容量运用了。它能和轻拍入无边际的生计被提供顺便说一句宇宙。 标志是, 主角在这新年龄能来自中国。中国会共同地经营从一个社会政治观点。但是它有人以一个爱好为发现个人主义的机会做生意和挣金钱由利用新想法和新机会。他们能 做那么有些, 象这样的行为在美国加固大众的利益而不是破坏。
